Blog @ Formifyr

How to Score a Likert Scale A Simple Guide for Researchers

Likert scales are powerful tools for measuring attitudes, opinions, and perceptions in surveys and research. Developed by psychologist Rensis Likert, these scales typically range from one extreme to another, allowing respondents to express their level of agreement or disagreement with a statement.

Unlimited forms and submissions for free

At Formifyr, we offer unlimited forms, submissions, and all the tools you need to craft professional forms and surveys.

Start your free trial

A hand holding a pencil and marking a Likert scale on a survey form. The hand is circling a rating option from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree."

To score a Likert scale, researchers assign numerical values to each response option and calculate the mean or median score across all items. This process transforms qualitative data into quantitative measurements, enabling statistical analysis and comparison. The most common Likert scale uses five points, but seven-point and even-numbered scales are also used depending on the research objectives.

When designing a Likert scale survey, it’s crucial to craft clear, unambiguous statements and provide balanced response options. Online survey tools like Formifyr can streamline the process of creating and distributing Likert scale questionnaires, making it easier for researchers to gather and analyze data efficiently.

Understanding Likert Scales and Their Design

A Likert scale with 5 options, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, displayed on a clean and simple chart

Likert scales are versatile tools for measuring attitudes, opinions, and behaviors in research and surveys. They offer a structured approach to capturing respondent perspectives across various domains.

Conceptual Foundation of Likert Scales

Rensis Likert developed the Likert scale in 1932 as a method to assess attitudes. It presents a statement or question followed by a range of response options. These options typically represent degrees of agreement, frequency, or opinion.

Likert scales assume attitudes can be measured on a linear continuum. They provide respondents with a spectrum of choices, allowing for nuanced expression of views.

The scale usually includes a neutral midpoint, giving respondents the option to indicate neither agreement nor disagreement.

Designing a Likert Scale Survey

Effective Likert scale design requires careful consideration of several elements. The number of response options is crucial, with 5-point and 7-point scales being most common.

Response options should be clearly labeled and evenly spaced. For example:

  1. Strongly Disagree
  2. Disagree
  3. Neutral
  4. Agree
  5. Strongly Agree

Balancing positive and negative statements helps reduce response bias. It’s important to use clear, unambiguous language in both statements and response options.

Researchers must decide between unipolar scales (measuring a single concept) and bipolar scales (measuring opposing concepts).

Common Likert Scale Formats

5-point scales are widely used due to their simplicity and ease of understanding. They offer sufficient gradation without overwhelming respondents.

7-point scales provide more nuanced data but may increase cognitive load. They’re useful when finer distinctions are needed.

Frequency scales measure how often respondents engage in certain behaviors:

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Always

Agreement scales assess the level of concordance with statements:

  • Strongly Disagree
  • Disagree
  • Neither Agree nor Disagree
  • Agree
  • Strongly Agree

Tools like Formifyr can streamline the process of creating Likert scale surveys, offering customizable templates and easy distribution options.

Analyzing and Scoring Likert Scale Data

A hand holding a pen, marking a Likert scale survey sheet. A chart displaying data analysis and scoring methods in the background

Analyzing Likert scale data requires careful preparation, calculation of scores, and application of appropriate statistical techniques. Proper analysis ensures accurate interpretation of survey results and meaningful insights.

Preparing Data for Analysis

To begin analyzing Likert scale data, organize responses in a spreadsheet or statistical software. Assign numerical values to each response option (e.g., 1 for “Strongly Disagree” to 5 for “Strongly Agree”). Ensure consistency in coding direction across all items.

Check for missing data and decide how to handle it. Options include listwise deletion or imputation methods. Remove any invalid responses.

Consider reverse-coding negatively worded items to align with the overall scale direction. This step is crucial for accurate score calculation.

Calculating Scores and Interpreting Results

Calculate individual item scores and overall scale scores. For single items, use the mode or median as the central tendency measure, as Likert data is ordinal.

For multi-item scales, sum or average the scores across items. This approach assumes interval-level data, which is common in practice.

Create bar charts or frequency tables to visualize response distributions. These tools help identify patterns and trends in the data.

Calculate descriptive statistics like mean, median, and standard deviation for scale scores. Interpret these values in context of the scale range and research questions.

Advanced Statistical Techniques

For deeper analysis, apply advanced statistical methods. Cronbach’s alpha assesses internal consistency reliability for multi-item scales.

Use non-parametric tests like Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis for group comparisons. These tests are appropriate for ordinal data.

Spearman’s correlation can examine relationships between Likert items or scales. This technique accounts for the ordinal nature of the data.

Factor analysis or principal component analysis can uncover underlying constructs in multi-item scales. These methods help validate scale structure.

Consider using Formifyr to create and distribute Likert scale surveys. This tool can streamline data collection and export results for analysis.